Crime+Scene+Script

media type="custom" key="4705133"My name is Detective Walczak. Two weeks ago I was called to a crime scene at a two bedroom and one bathroom beach house and the body was found on the patio. The alleged victim was Felix Navidad. He was a very unhappy man and he never had any love because his parents died in a bungee jumping accident. He dropped out of collage and he never kept a job for long. He constantly criticized people and things. When his parents died he gained a huge amount of money. When he moved into the Beach House he was still remodeling but he had a house warming party with his friends, or what he thought were his friends. He was found on the patio by Alfrado at 3:00pm. The suspect guilty of committing this crime is Gene and Vera. Gene was a store manager at the time and he took his dog Sasha for a walk and when he came back he fell asleep. He said he didn't let the dog onto the patio but there was dogprints everywhere at the crime scene. Vera was a girl who loved chocolate and things with chocolate on it. She went for a walk at 2:00pm up in the Hills. She came back and Felix was dead. This suspect's guilt was confimed through the testing and results of evidence collected at the crime scene. The most incriminating piece of evidence was the dogprints. The evidence was found on the patio. The test performed was footprints identify. The results of the test were that the dogprints kept traveling from across the patio. Gene said that he didn't let the dog onto the patio but the dogprints were everywhere. .This connects the suspect to the crime because this proves that Gene lying. The next piece of evidence collected was the icecube tray. It was found by the corner of the patio. The test performed was the Ph test. The results of the test were that the the water from the icecube tray was an acid.Maybe he poisoned Felix with help from Vera cause she had powder on her shoe and there was the same powder on the tray. This connects the suspect to the crime because it was powder from Vera and Gene helped. Another piece of evidence collected was the cologne on towel. It was found scene five. The test performed wasa smelling test to figure out if it was perfume or colone. The results of the test were at scene 5 there was a trash bin.In the trash bin there was a towel. It had the inicials of K.G. on it but it had Gene's colone on it. The name of the colone was Abercrombie+ Fitch. This connects the suspect to the crime because Gene's colone was found on it. (How does this prove Gene murdered Felix?) The last piece of evidence collected was wool sweater peices. It was found mostly in scene three. The test performed was a burning test. The results of the test were that the wool burned just like the mystery peices of yarn or wool. The wool burned fast, smoooth, the color was grey, and powdery and the mystery burned fast, smooth, the color was grey, and powdery too. This connects the suspect to the crime because Gene was wearing a wool sweater at the time. (How does wearing a wool sweater prove he had anything to do with the crime?) According to the evidence, the following is an account of the events believed to have gone down on that fateful day. The day he invited his "friends" Gene and Vera were the ones who didn't really like him. When Felix told everyone of his "friends" that they were in his will they thought if he killed him he would get the money. So he told everyone that he was going to walk his dog and go to bed after that. When he got back he went to work. He went upstairs and pretened to sleep. When he heard Alfredo leave the patio he got Vera and his dog (The dog only follows Gene) and went down stairs. She gave Felix an icecube with some kind of poison so he would die. When they heard Alfredo coming they ran upstairs and went to their rooms. Then they were callled down stairs and he told them that Felix was dead. Therefore, Gene committed the crime of purpose of a death for the money so they could be a rich. **Rubric for Podcasts** introduction. Provides relevant information and establishes a clear purpose engaging the listener immediately. || **__ Describes the topic and engages the audience as the introduction proceeds. __** || Somewhat engaging (covers well-known topic), and provides a vague purpose. || Irrelevant or inappropriate topic that minimally engages listener. Does not include an introduction or the purpose is vague and unclear. ||^  || A little more practice will help you not stumble over some words || Appears unrehearsed with uneven delivery. || Delivery is hesitant, and choppy and sounds like the presenter is reading. ||^  || Slow your pacing down. You're reading too fast. || Enunciation, expression, rhythm are sometimes distracting during the podcast. || Enunciation of spoken word is distant and muddled and not clear. Expression and rhythm are distracting throughout the podcast. ||^  || 86% ||
 * ** CATEGORY ** || ** Exemplary **  || ** Proficient **  || ** Partially Proficient **  || ** Incomplete **  || ** POINTS **  ||
 * ** Introduction ** || ** 3 points ** || ** 2 points ** || ** 1 points ** || ** 0 points ** || ||
 * ^  || Catchy and clever
 * ^  || **__Tells who is speaking, date the podcast was produced, and where the speaker is located.__**  || Tells most of the following: who is speaking, date of the podcast, and location of speaker.  || Alludes to who is speaking, date of the podcast, and location of speaker.  || Speaker is not identified. No production date or location of the speaker is provided.  ||^   ||
 * ** Content ** || ** 6 points ** || ** 4 points ** || ** 2 points ** || ** 0 points ** || ||
 * ^  || __** The motive was detailed and clearly based on information delivered throughout the investigation.  **__ || The motive is detailed and based on partial information delivered throughout the investigation.  || The motive is not very detailed and is sprinkled with inaccurate information.  || The motive is missing, or unclear or all information is inaccurate.  ||^   ||
 * ^  || Four pieces of strong evidence were presented and linked to the suspect in an organized, methodical manner.  || Three or four pieces of evidence were presented and/or linked to the suspect in a somewhat organized, thoughtful manner.  || ** __Two pieces of shaky evidence were presented and/or loosely linked to the suspect. Lack of organization.__  ** || One to no pieces of unimportant evidence were presented in an unorganized manner.  ||^   ||
 * ^  || The events in the scenario are detailed, extremely organized and strongly supported with evidence and facts related to the crime scene.  || __**The events in the scenario are well organized, somewhat detailed, and supported with evidence from the crime scene.**__ || The events in the crime scene lack organization, detail, and are weakly supported with evidence from the crime scene. || There was no clear direction and evidence was unimportant. ||^   ||
 * ^  || __** Conclusion clearly summarizes key information.  **__ || Conclusion summarizes information.  || Conclusion vaguely summarizes key information  || No conclusion is provided.  ||^   ||
 * ** Delivery ** || ** 3 points ** || ** 2 points ** || ** 1 point ** || ** 0 points ** || ||
 * ^  || Well rehearsed, smooth delivery in a conversational style.  || __**Rehearsed, smooth delivery.**__
 * ^  || Highly effective enunciation and presenter's speech is clear and intelligible, not distant and muddled. Expression, and rhythm keep the audience listening. || **__ Enunciation, expression, pacing are effective throughout the podcast.  __**
 * ^  || **__Correct grammar is used throughout the podcast.__**  || Correct grammar is used during most of the podcast.  || Occasionally incorrect grammar is used during the podcast.  || Poor grammar is used throughout the podcast.  ||^   ||
 * ** Graphic and Music Enhancements ** || ** 3 points ** || ** 2 points ** || ** 1 points ** || ** 0 points ** || ||
 * ^  || **__Music enhances the mood, quality, and understanding of the presentation.__**  || Music provides supportive background to the podcast.  || Music provides somewhat distracting background to the podcast.  || Music is distracting to presentation.  ||^   ||
 * ^  || **__All music enhancements are owned by the creator of the podcast or copyright cleared with appropriate documentation.__**  || Music enhancements are owned by the creator of the podcast or copyright cleared.  || Use of copyrighted works is questionable.  || Copyright infringement is obvious.  ||^   ||
 * ** Technical Production ** || ** 3 points ** || ** 2 points ** || ** 1 points ** || ** 0 points ** || ||
 * ^  || **__Presentation is recorded in a quiet environment without background noise and distractions.__**  || Presentation is recorded in a quiet environment with minimal background noise and distractions.  || Presentation is recorded in a semi-quiet environment with some background noise and distractions.  || Presentation is recorded in a noisy environment with constant background noise and distractions.  ||^   ||
 * ^  || **__Transitions are smooth and spaced correctly without noisy, dead space.__**  || Transitions are smooth with a minimal amount of ambient noise.  || Transitions are uneven with inconsistent spacing; ambient noise is present.  || Transitions are abrupt and background noise needs to be filtered.  ||^   ||
 * ^  || __**Volume of voice, music, and effects enhance the presentation.**__  || Volume is acceptable.  || Volume is occasionally inconsistent.  || Volume changes are highly distracting.  ||^   ||
 * ^  || **__Podcast length keeps the audience interested and engaged.__**  || Podcast length keeps audience listening.  || Podcast length is somewhat long or somewhat short to keep audience engaged.  || Podcast is either too long or too short to keep the audience engaged.  ||^   ||
 * ** TOTAL POINTS ** || 49/57